







That took me by suprise, though - to my eyes it looked very much like a StuG III Ausf E.John Donnelly wrote:The other AFV is a Stug IV.
John Palmer wrote:The snow and mud in the two AFV dioramas are first class, and exactly illustrate the point I sought to make in the 'Festive Thoughts' thread about cross-fertilisation of ideas and techniques between different areas of modelling interest. I've seen a few layouts that represent winter frosts, but the only snow covered layout that immediately springs to mind is Royston Vaisey.
John Palmer wrote: That took me by suprise, though - to my eyes it looked very much like a StuG III Ausf E.
BrockleyAndrew wrote:I'm always caught between the idea of the snapshot/diaorama and the movement. In one way, the movement of the loco/train is what gives its versilimitude in a static frame (It's weird how we can accept non -movement of every part of the scene but our preferred element) But it is also amazing that we enjoy watching the movement. And really, the suspension of disbelief is the first rule for all of this.
John Donnelly wrote:I know some railway modellers who say that they can't see the point of making models such as these as nothing moves.
essdee wrote:Interesting! Yet I can almost 'hear' the sounds associated with that lovely MTB and its superb turning wake:
Noel wrote: I'm surprised she is not flying any Kriegsmarine ensigns...
John Donnelly wrote:… and the gun at the bow hasn't yet been fitted.
Craig Warton wrote:
What are the origins of the Panzer IV kit? It looks to be an a Ausf D or E refitted with a long 75mm and Schurzen.
Return to “Scenery and Structures”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest