A small question. I am about to do track on a viaduct for the first time and am unsure as to the positioning of checkrails. It will be bullhead rail so I assume the checkrails will be the same. How far ahead of the bridge do the checkrails need to start and do they go the full length? Apologies if my terminology is not correct.
Cheers,
David
Track on bridges and viaducts
-
- Posts: 364
- Joined: Sun May 05, 2013 5:23 pm
Re: Track on bridges and viaducts
Hi David,
From memory, each viaduct was done differently, the aim of the check rails was to prevent derailed vehicles going over the side. Without knowing your preferred prototype and period, I can't be more specific, being a GW aficionado.
Phil
From memory, each viaduct was done differently, the aim of the check rails was to prevent derailed vehicles going over the side. Without knowing your preferred prototype and period, I can't be more specific, being a GW aficionado.
Phil
-
- Posts: 819
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 6:02 pm
Re: Track on bridges and viaducts
In theory the track would be in southwest Scotland so G&SW, Caley territory originally then LMS but modelled in early BR days.
Cheers,
David
Cheers,
David
-
- Forum Team
- Posts: 3922
- Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 8:02 pm
Re: Track on bridges and viaducts
For interest GW/BR(W) practice can be seen here:
http://www.norgrove.me.uk/GWRtracknotes/R1777.pdf
http://www.norgrove.me.uk/GWRtracknotes/R4340a.pdf
http://www.norgrove.me.uk/GWRtracknotes/R4296A.pdf
http://www.norgrove.me.uk/GWRtracknotes/R4340b.pdf
http://www.norgrove.me.uk/GWRtracknotes/R4350.pdf
Other companies may do similar or different things, inside guard rails would be quite difficult on longitudinal timbers with bull head track so a lot depends on the viaduct construction.
Rgds
http://www.norgrove.me.uk/GWRtracknotes/R1777.pdf
http://www.norgrove.me.uk/GWRtracknotes/R4340a.pdf
http://www.norgrove.me.uk/GWRtracknotes/R4296A.pdf
http://www.norgrove.me.uk/GWRtracknotes/R4340b.pdf
http://www.norgrove.me.uk/GWRtracknotes/R4350.pdf
Other companies may do similar or different things, inside guard rails would be quite difficult on longitudinal timbers with bull head track so a lot depends on the viaduct construction.
Rgds
-
- Posts: 850
- Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 12:01 pm
Re: Track on bridges and viaducts
On the Ouse Valley viaduct we have found that the style of guard rails changes quite often, usually some form of FB rail (probably conductor rail) spiked in the four-foot, but at varying gauges, and sometimes some form of rail or bar attached to the outside of the running rail. (Our question would be why do they keep changing it - I'm not aware of any incidents that might have caused a review.)
We're going for something like the first one.
We're going for something like the first one.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Rod
-
- Posts: 1172
- Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 4:27 pm
Re: Track on bridges and viaducts
Plain rail spiked to the sleepers for the guard rails on Chirk Viaduct in 1989:
Starting well in advance of the viaduct in the facing direction, but finishing immediately at the trailing end.
Chirk Aqueduct on the left:
Martin.
Starting well in advance of the viaduct in the facing direction, but finishing immediately at the trailing end.
Chirk Aqueduct on the left:
Martin.
40+ years developing Templot. Enjoy using Templot? Join Templot Club. Be a Templot supporter.
-
- Posts: 819
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 6:02 pm
Re: Track on bridges and viaducts
Thanks to all. I now have a sense of direction as to what I’m going to do.
Cheers,
David
Cheers,
David
-
- Posts: 1981
- Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:04 pm
Re: Track on bridges and viaducts
"Bridges for Modellers" shows viaducts without guard rails in a number of cases; https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/extra-rails-over-bridges.117035/ may explain at least some of the reasons why, although some photos in the book suggest that the answer may be rather more complex. It may be that train speed and length of viaduct also affect the situation, although that is speculation on my part.
Regards
Noel
Noel
-
- Forum Team
- Posts: 3922
- Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 8:02 pm
Re: Track on bridges and viaducts
One of the requirements of the HMRI was that bridges and viaducts should have substantial parapets a minimum of 12" above rail level and capable of restraining a derailed vehicle from falling off said bridge/viaduct. In the absence of such a parapet then guard rails were required, THe only place speed could come into it was in calculating the adequacy of a parapet.
Rgds
Rgds
Return to “Track and Turnouts”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Amazonbot, Bilton Junction, ClaudeBot and 1 guest