Coupling pole for scale couplings
-
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 4:18 pm
Coupling pole for scale couplings
Any advice on the best type of coupling pole for use with 3 links and screw couplings?
I've tried using a piece of bent brass wire attached to a small torch, but I'm sure that a little more sophisticated shape to the hook may work better. Does anyone have any suggestions for improvements?
Thanks, Chris
I've tried using a piece of bent brass wire attached to a small torch, but I'm sure that a little more sophisticated shape to the hook may work better. Does anyone have any suggestions for improvements?
Thanks, Chris
-
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 8:25 pm
Re: Coupling pole for scale couplings
Chris,
After years on the end of a shunter's pole exhibiting Middlepeak, I reached the conclusion that the best tool was a short piece of 0.3mm nickel-silver wire mounted in a pin chuck, with the last 3mm or so bent to a right angle. The wire is strong enough to pick up a 3-link, but not so big that when you have placed the link over the coupling hook, it pulls it off on 'withdrawal'.
I found that this won hands down over magnetic devices every time, although it comes down to personal preferences. One critical part of the armoury though was the backscene - a nice solid structure on which you could steady your uncoupling arm, as any kind of nervous twitch had the potential to snag the wire in the wrong part of the coupling and send the wagons off the rails. And of course this always happened when you had a wagon full of loose stone chippings in the train!
I calculated once that during the course of an average exhibition day, each operator was completing around 400 coupling or uncoupling operations. On this basis we had to find a method that was simple and worked!
Regards,
Geraint Hughes
1645
After years on the end of a shunter's pole exhibiting Middlepeak, I reached the conclusion that the best tool was a short piece of 0.3mm nickel-silver wire mounted in a pin chuck, with the last 3mm or so bent to a right angle. The wire is strong enough to pick up a 3-link, but not so big that when you have placed the link over the coupling hook, it pulls it off on 'withdrawal'.
I found that this won hands down over magnetic devices every time, although it comes down to personal preferences. One critical part of the armoury though was the backscene - a nice solid structure on which you could steady your uncoupling arm, as any kind of nervous twitch had the potential to snag the wire in the wrong part of the coupling and send the wagons off the rails. And of course this always happened when you had a wagon full of loose stone chippings in the train!
I calculated once that during the course of an average exhibition day, each operator was completing around 400 coupling or uncoupling operations. On this basis we had to find a method that was simple and worked!
Regards,
Geraint Hughes
1645
Geraint Hughes
Cromford & High Peak in P4
Danish Railways in P87
Cromford & High Peak in P4
Danish Railways in P87
-
- Forum Team
- Posts: 3046
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 6:00 pm
Re: Coupling pole for scale couplings
ChrisMitchell wrote:Any advice on the best type of coupling pole for use with 3 links and screw couplings?
I've tried using a piece of bent brass wire attached to a small torch, but I'm sure that a little more sophisticated shape to the hook may work better. Does anyone have any suggestions for improvements?
By the genius of Matt Ots' MRJ Index, a moment's work finds:
A Shunters Pole for 4mm
William Barter
Issue 21 (1988)
p.69
4mm
W. A. M. Barter on making three-link couplings easier to live with.
A quick consultation of the bound volumes of MRJs upstairs and it's a one page article using a soft iron pin to produce a complex shape that replicates the prototype.
I'm afraid that I've recently scrapped my aged printer, so I can't stick the page online somewhere, but you may even have the copy of MRJ yourself.
HTH
Paul Willis
Beware of Trains - occasional modelling in progress!
www.5522models.co.uk
www.5522models.co.uk
-
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 4:18 pm
Re: Coupling pole for scale couplings
Thnaks for this info.
I've got a full set of MRJs, so I dug out the article and had a couple of attempts - I failed miserably of course.
I'll think I'll adopt Geraint's method - a quick go with a piece of bent brass wire seemed to work. Of course the proof of the pudding will be at Scaleforum with my entry in the D&E challenge. Here's hoping!!!
Chris
I've got a full set of MRJs, so I dug out the article and had a couple of attempts - I failed miserably of course.
I'll think I'll adopt Geraint's method - a quick go with a piece of bent brass wire seemed to work. Of course the proof of the pudding will be at Scaleforum with my entry in the D&E challenge. Here's hoping!!!
Chris
-
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:23 am
Re: Coupling pole for scale couplings
Is getting hold of a soft iron pin the problem? Buy a shirt in the sales, throw away the shirt, keep the pins that are used to pack it. But no doubt one of the specialist pin manufacturers that we know about these days can supply them, or just use brass wire. It is the shape that counts, as the twisting of the hook to the side allows it to be released easily by rolling the shaft between your fingers.
William Barter
William Barter
-
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 4:18 pm
Re: Coupling pole for scale couplings
William
I had a few attempts with brass lace making pins. As I understood the orginal article the shape of the hook is bent in 3 dimensions. I struggled to get the bend of the hook (bend C in the diagram) in a different plane to the other two bends. In the picture below bends A and B are also into the plane (away from the viewer). I could not get bend C to lie in thep lane (it always wanted to come out of the plane toowrds the viewer)
I'll have another go tonight.
Chris
I had a few attempts with brass lace making pins. As I understood the orginal article the shape of the hook is bent in 3 dimensions. I struggled to get the bend of the hook (bend C in the diagram) in a different plane to the other two bends. In the picture below bends A and B are also into the plane (away from the viewer). I could not get bend C to lie in thep lane (it always wanted to come out of the plane toowrds the viewer)
I'll have another go tonight.
Chris
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 8:25 pm
Re: Coupling pole for scale couplings
Chris,
Keep it simple - just a plain old right angle! I suspect the shape of hook you suggest will be more likely to catch in the links as you're trying to pull it away.
Regards,
Geraint
Keep it simple - just a plain old right angle! I suspect the shape of hook you suggest will be more likely to catch in the links as you're trying to pull it away.
Regards,
Geraint
Geraint Hughes
Cromford & High Peak in P4
Danish Railways in P87
Cromford & High Peak in P4
Danish Railways in P87
-
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:23 am
Re: Coupling pole for scale couplings
It's 20 years since I made one, should make another to remind myself! But I think if you do bend C first, then B the A it works better. As for getting stuck in the links, no, that is just what it doesn't do, as it is released by twisting in the fingers and so sort of rolls out from underneath the link, with the point then downwards and unlikely to pick up another link by accident. Following the prototype is another good rule, and I spent several hours staring at one in my little office at Severn Tunnel Junction trying to work out how it was shaped.
William Barter
William Barter
-
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:23 am
Re: Coupling pole for scale couplings
Chris,
Looking at your message again properly, it is right that bend C goes the opposite way to A and B. But drawn the way you have it, A and B should be coming towards the viewer, and C goes away from the viewer.
Hope that helps!
William
Looking at your message again properly, it is right that bend C goes the opposite way to A and B. But drawn the way you have it, A and B should be coming towards the viewer, and C goes away from the viewer.
Hope that helps!
William
-
- Posts: 247
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 6:11 pm
Re: Coupling pole for scale couplings
Attached are some pictures of my current coupling pole and a new one made today. The old one is made from 0.5 brass wire attached to a length of rail and the whole lot stuck to a pen torch. I find it invaluable to have extra light to see between whatever you are coupling. The one is made from 0.5 nickel-silver wire again soldered to rail. The rail gives a nice flat surface to attach to the torch. The design was influence bt the article in MRJ.
As you can see from this plan view the tail is bent slightly like the prototype, I find when you have coupled to, to rotate the torch slightly this allow you disengage without catching the wagon etc.
You will notice the bend is to the left as I am left handed.
As you can see from this plan view the tail is bent slightly like the prototype, I find when you have coupled to, to rotate the torch slightly this allow you disengage without catching the wagon etc.
You will notice the bend is to the left as I am left handed.
-
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:23 am
Re: Coupling pole for scale couplings
Here's a couple of mine.
William Barter
William Barter
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Uncoupling Hooks
Does anyone know where I can get hold of an uncoupling hook used to handle three-link couplings? I believe I've seen some that have a torch built into it.
-
- Posts: 1515
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 5:30 pm
Re: Uncoupling Hooks
Not difficult to make your own. I made mine by twisting the pointed end of a Peco track pin into a pigtail and inserting it into a suitable handle. I don't use a torch but have seen people using small ones that come with key rings and strapping them to the handle.
David
David
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 10:28 am
-
- Forum Team
- Posts: 3923
- Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 8:02 pm
Re: Uncoupling Hooks
Mind you almost anything will do for uncoupling, its the coupling up where the fun comes
Keith
Keith
Re: Uncoupling Hooks
grovenor-2685 wrote:Mind you almost anything will do for uncoupling, its the coupling up where the fun comes
Keith
Well it's partly because I took the anything will do approach that I got into difficulty; tweezers are not a good idea. Does anyone have any experience of using a magnetic uncoupling device?
-
- Posts: 2870
- Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2008 4:40 pm
Re: Uncoupling Hooks
Only works if you've got iron links at the end.
Tim V
(Not all railways in Somerset went to Dorset)
(Not all railways in Somerset went to Dorset)
-
- Forum Team
- Posts: 3923
- Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 8:02 pm
Re: Uncoupling Hooks
Yes, I have used the original Studiolith magnetic shunters pole, and still do. As Tim says it only works if you have a magnetic link at the end of the chain, and if the other 2 are not magnetic. Very simple for uncoupling, a real aquired art to couple up, but probably no harder than any other.
See http://www.scalefour.org/history/p4rscomponents.html right at the bottom of the page.
Keith
See http://www.scalefour.org/history/p4rscomponents.html right at the bottom of the page.
Keith
-
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:23 am
Re: Uncoupling Hooks
grovenor-2685 wrote:Mind you almost anything will do for uncoupling, its the coupling up where the fun comes
Keith
That is the beauty of David B's hook-shape - as the end of the pigtail points almost sideways, twisting the pole in the fingers releases the link as the hook rolls out from underneath it.
That shape is in fact very close to the prototype. As for uncoupling, indeed the hook itself plays no part, you just stick the pole over the buffer (fulcrum) and under the link and lean on your end of it.
Here's mine, made from a soft iron pin such as comes with shirts - keep the pins and throw the shirt away.
William
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 7:32 am
Re: Uncoupling Hooks
Coupling hooks are a very personal thing! I can't use anyone else's and no-one else gets on with mine.
I find the links drop off the pigtail shaped hooks too easily so I prefer a simple hook shape. Torches make too clumsy a handle for me so I use something like williambarter's. Good illumination is a big help though, I wear a headtorch when I have a lot of coupling to do.
Have a think about what you need and make a prototype, tweak it until it works for you. Twenty years on, I'm still tweaking mine occasionally Then make several hooks because they tend to hide when you need one!
I find the links drop off the pigtail shaped hooks too easily so I prefer a simple hook shape. Torches make too clumsy a handle for me so I use something like williambarter's. Good illumination is a big help though, I wear a headtorch when I have a lot of coupling to do.
Have a think about what you need and make a prototype, tweak it until it works for you. Twenty years on, I'm still tweaking mine occasionally Then make several hooks because they tend to hide when you need one!
-
- Posts: 1983
- Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:04 pm
Re: Uncoupling Hooks
I made a couple of hooks from fine brass wire, soldered into tube which was then glued to the end of a pencil torch. The basic shape was bent up following the shape of full size version illustrated in an article in MRJ 21. The tube was for rigidity as I didn't want too much spring in the hook. The overall length is about 3 inches from the face of the torch. The principle is the same as the ones shown in earlier postings.
When fitting three link couplings I would suggest:
Links and hooks which are slightly overscale make life easier. I use the Smith's version, which have to be made up, but for which magnetic links are available. Alternatively it is possible to make your own.
Ensure that the links move freely.
Three links or screw couplings are not really compatible with corridor connectors on coaches.
Apologies if this seems a bit obvious ...
Noel
When fitting three link couplings I would suggest:
Links and hooks which are slightly overscale make life easier. I use the Smith's version, which have to be made up, but for which magnetic links are available. Alternatively it is possible to make your own.
Ensure that the links move freely.
Three links or screw couplings are not really compatible with corridor connectors on coaches.
Apologies if this seems a bit obvious ...
Noel
Regards
Noel
Noel
-
- Posts: 2527
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 3:54 pm
Re: Uncoupling Hooks
There is no doubt that the choice of coupling hook is personal. My taste in such things has developed over the years, from a plain strait hook when dealing with relatively course objects attached to OO models, to a more subtle curved and bent variety for dealing with the more refined scale couplings generally found on the front of P4 models. The same progress forced a migration to a finer wire too. The picture shows my life collection, the two in the front are the only ones I would want to use today. My hook shape is a bit more primitive than Mr Bamber's, but like his, uncoupling is performed by rolling the shaft of the hook between the fingers, so the end revolves around the shaft and winds itself out of the link. Perhaps because I have a slightly more pronounced hook, unlike Simon, I have no problem with premature disengagement. In use it quickly becomes obvious that this design is handed. Which hand you need depends whether you want to couple the link on the left to the hook on the right or visa versa. My hooks had always been double ended, and now I had a good reason, left hand at one end right hand at the other. Though which is which is a level of definition I have yet to reach.
The wire is fine steel. To make, form a semi circular U bend over a suitable sized drill (say about 1-1.5 mm), snip off one side of the U, and bend the curved section 90 degrees sideways. Repeat at the other end, remembering to bend the other way. The grip is coiled low voltage insulated cable, the difficult bit is getting that to solder to the steel wire.
In my advancing years I need more light too, I find a LED head torch is just the thing.
Will
P.S. Join the Campaign for Real Couplings - Auto couplers, Jackson, Dingham or Hornby nee Triang, are all the work of the devil.
The wire is fine steel. To make, form a semi circular U bend over a suitable sized drill (say about 1-1.5 mm), snip off one side of the U, and bend the curved section 90 degrees sideways. Repeat at the other end, remembering to bend the other way. The grip is coiled low voltage insulated cable, the difficult bit is getting that to solder to the steel wire.
In my advancing years I need more light too, I find a LED head torch is just the thing.
Will
P.S. Join the Campaign for Real Couplings - Auto couplers, Jackson, Dingham or Hornby nee Triang, are all the work of the devil.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Posts: 1425
- Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 6:20 pm
Re: Uncoupling Hooks
Here's my version (designed and made about 30 years ago).
It is double-ended, with both left-handed and right-handed hooks.
The essential feature is the 'tail' bent at 45 degrees both forward and to one side (right or left for the right-handed and left-handed hooks respectively).
The shunter's pole is used by lowering it vertically, engaging the bottom link of the coupling with the tail, twisting the shaft between the fingers and lifting it vertically to pick up the link and drop it over the opposing hook. The tail is then disengaged by twisting in the opposite direction and then lifting the shunter's pole away.
I am grateful to Philip Hall for the photos, which were taken for a magazine article which has never been published.
It is double-ended, with both left-handed and right-handed hooks.
The essential feature is the 'tail' bent at 45 degrees both forward and to one side (right or left for the right-handed and left-handed hooks respectively).
The shunter's pole is used by lowering it vertically, engaging the bottom link of the coupling with the tail, twisting the shaft between the fingers and lifting it vertically to pick up the link and drop it over the opposing hook. The tail is then disengaged by twisting in the opposite direction and then lifting the shunter's pole away.
I am grateful to Philip Hall for the photos, which were taken for a magazine article which has never been published.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: Uncoupling Hooks
Many thanks for all your comments. I have, since posting, bought a 4mm shunting pole complete with torch from Lanarkshire Models. I'll see how I get on with that. Regarding the magnetic shunters pole, has anyone ever produced an electro-magnetic pole where the magnet can be switched on and off?
Return to “Operating in Practice”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot and 0 guests