Hi
I have been looking at the "plywood disaster" thread.
From what I can understand, it is widely accepted that once the the ballast has been glue down using either cork or closed cell rubber as underlay, that conventional methods result in, what many people consider to be annoying levels of noise. This being due to the baseboard material acting as a "drum".
I was reading a thread on another forum that suggested using a sound deadening material such as curtain material hung from baseboard down to the floor would at least reduce the noise. I would imagine the thicker the material the better. Has anyone used this method and does it work?
Reduction of noise from baseboards
-
- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2015 3:39 pm
Re: Reduction of noise from baseboards
When we are looking to address acoustics, there are generally two different aspects we look to mitigate ... airborne sound and impact sound through the structure. Airborne sound is managed by a mixture of absorption and sealing. Impact sound (drum like) is dealt with by a mixture of isolation, damping and mass. I suspect the main problem with track noise is one of amplification through the structure ... particularly when a thin plywood skin is involved. The fact that the glue and ballast mix appears to destroy any isolation which previously existed between the structure and the track, and because the 'drum' structure has been dictated by the need to keep weight down, damping is all that is left to us. This could be achieved by packing the voids with wadding, .... I also think that the sound deadening approach now taken in motorcar bodywork might also be quite effective where portions of deadening material are bonded directly to the skin. https://www.vwheritage.com/camper-van-camping-accessories/stp-sound-deadening-insulation
Curtain material hung to the floor might have some deadening effect as it would absorb the airborne sound from beneath the layout and to some extent would mitigate sound leakage, but I would be surprised if it had a big effect.
Those would be my thoughts, for what they are worth.
Curtain material hung to the floor might have some deadening effect as it would absorb the airborne sound from beneath the layout and to some extent would mitigate sound leakage, but I would be surprised if it had a big effect.
Those would be my thoughts, for what they are worth.
Tim Lee
-
- Posts: 546
- Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 10:05 pm
Re: Reduction of noise from baseboards
Has anyone tried using egg trays( papier Mache) under the base boards?
If so, was it effective?
If so, was it effective?
LesG
The man who never made a mistake
never made anything useful
The man who never made a mistake
never made anything useful
-
- Posts: 2870
- Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2008 4:40 pm
Re: Reduction of noise from baseboards
As I pointed out in the other thread, it isn't the baseboards that are noisy, it is poorly engineered stuff running on top of it.
Look there first - remove those XO4s (and the like), fit properly engineered bearings, decent gearboxes, decent motors. Plus controllers that don't make the motors buzz with feedback (DCC is good at eliminating this ...).
Or you could do none of these and just turn up the stereo in the railway room
Look there first - remove those XO4s (and the like), fit properly engineered bearings, decent gearboxes, decent motors. Plus controllers that don't make the motors buzz with feedback (DCC is good at eliminating this ...).
Or you could do none of these and just turn up the stereo in the railway room
Tim V
(Not all railways in Somerset went to Dorset)
(Not all railways in Somerset went to Dorset)
-
- Posts: 2527
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 3:54 pm
Re: Reduction of noise from baseboards
And springing your stock significantly reduces the drumming effect.
-
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 9:42 pm
Re: Reduction of noise from baseboards
Noise bounces off hard surfaces and reverberates around the room, but is absorbed by soft materials. When my acoustic colleagues were asked to deal with excess noise in trendy restaurants, they advised cutting down the reverberated noise by replacing hard furniture and decor with soft: it worked a treat.
So yes, I think heavy-ish curtains would help reduce the overall noise level, as would soft floor-covering, but I couldn't begin to guess what percentage improvement you might expect.
I cannot vouch for the noise-attenuating properties of teddy bear fur after it has been dipped in green paint....
Regards,
Bob
So yes, I think heavy-ish curtains would help reduce the overall noise level, as would soft floor-covering, but I couldn't begin to guess what percentage improvement you might expect.
I cannot vouch for the noise-attenuating properties of teddy bear fur after it has been dipped in green paint....
Regards,
Bob
-
- Forum Team
- Posts: 2427
- Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 7:46 am
Re: Reduction of noise from baseboards
Noise can be a problem but in my experience only for layouts used at home. All the layouts I have been involved with have been designed to take to exhibitions and when testing at home the noise is evident. However, in an exhibition hall the ambient noise in the hall from visitors cancels out any noise from the layout. A few weeks ago Elcot Road was shown at an exhibition held in a school with most of the layouts in classrooms, so a much smaller space than usual. Even with a few visitors in the room - more than 8, the noise was not apparent. This would support the point Bob puts forward about soft surfaces absorbing sound.
For layouts used at home, and which are in a bedroom or loft space, the noise could we be annoying for those in rooms below, but in other spaces it is probably liveable with.
I am not convinced that all the noise is due to the mechanism and bearings of the locos. At home there is not sufficient room in my workshop to set up the fiddle yard with the rest of the layout so for testing a small fiddle yard is used. This has two lengths of plastic sleepered track just fixed down at the ends with the rest sitting loose on the top surface. Locos are quiet on the fiddle yard but there is far more noise when they run ionto the layout itself where the track is glued to cork and ballasted with scale granite chipping fixed with PVA glue.
Terry Bendall
For layouts used at home, and which are in a bedroom or loft space, the noise could we be annoying for those in rooms below, but in other spaces it is probably liveable with.
I am not convinced that all the noise is due to the mechanism and bearings of the locos. At home there is not sufficient room in my workshop to set up the fiddle yard with the rest of the layout so for testing a small fiddle yard is used. This has two lengths of plastic sleepered track just fixed down at the ends with the rest sitting loose on the top surface. Locos are quiet on the fiddle yard but there is far more noise when they run ionto the layout itself where the track is glued to cork and ballasted with scale granite chipping fixed with PVA glue.
Terry Bendall
-
- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2015 3:39 pm
Re: Reduction of noise from baseboards
Soft materials with depth will absorb sound .... they will not lessen the sound at source, but rather they impact on the reverberation or echo. Hence you put acoustic wadding on a wall or ceiling if you have a hard floor surface to stop the space echoing. People and books (as in a library) have a similar effect ... so less absorption is required in a packed theatre than would be the case if it were empty. Absorption will also to a minor extent reduce sound transference into adjacent spaces ... though the sound will be free to travel through any clear gaps (if you have two parts of a room separated even by thick floor to ceiling curtains, you can still hear pretty clearly what is being discussed!)
So absorption per se is not particularly good at preventing transmission of sound ... it just stops the original sound being reinforced or amplified. Once you have above a certain number of people in a hard surface space it becomes difficult to hear yourself speak because of sound reflection... so absorption becomes desirable ... the volume of the original sound input remains pretty much unchanged.
If the sound is coming from a mechanism such as the loco wheels and is transferring noise and vibration from above into the structure of the baseboard, then springing will prevent to some extent the transfer of this noise, but as the motor is floating on the axle (in most instances) and so not part of the sprung weight, it will not isolate the motor noise from the structure. The structure then amplifies the noise (like an echo does) by keeping it alive and overlaying it. The best solution is obviously to decouple the track from the baseboard, which would achieve the greatest minimisation (This I suspect is what is happening with Terry's fiddle yard). However, if you like hearing the sound of wheels on rails, then decoupling the upper body via springing will serve to some extent to reduce the overall volume.
If you accept that sound is being transferred into the structure causing amplification, then the next thing to consider is how you might restrict that amplification.
If you want to minimise the transfer of sound through the structure, then giving that structure some mass will help, or alternatively providing a degree of damping to stop the drum effect of a lightweight construction.
Following on from this, hanging fabric beneath to absorb the sound once it has exited would be the next strategy. Absorption will both stop any further amplification via reverberation in the enclose volume below the baseboards and will also muffle the amplified sound before it can exit from below.
Just a few thoughts.
So absorption per se is not particularly good at preventing transmission of sound ... it just stops the original sound being reinforced or amplified. Once you have above a certain number of people in a hard surface space it becomes difficult to hear yourself speak because of sound reflection... so absorption becomes desirable ... the volume of the original sound input remains pretty much unchanged.
If the sound is coming from a mechanism such as the loco wheels and is transferring noise and vibration from above into the structure of the baseboard, then springing will prevent to some extent the transfer of this noise, but as the motor is floating on the axle (in most instances) and so not part of the sprung weight, it will not isolate the motor noise from the structure. The structure then amplifies the noise (like an echo does) by keeping it alive and overlaying it. The best solution is obviously to decouple the track from the baseboard, which would achieve the greatest minimisation (This I suspect is what is happening with Terry's fiddle yard). However, if you like hearing the sound of wheels on rails, then decoupling the upper body via springing will serve to some extent to reduce the overall volume.
If you accept that sound is being transferred into the structure causing amplification, then the next thing to consider is how you might restrict that amplification.
If you want to minimise the transfer of sound through the structure, then giving that structure some mass will help, or alternatively providing a degree of damping to stop the drum effect of a lightweight construction.
Following on from this, hanging fabric beneath to absorb the sound once it has exited would be the next strategy. Absorption will both stop any further amplification via reverberation in the enclose volume below the baseboards and will also muffle the amplified sound before it can exit from below.
Just a few thoughts.
Tim Lee
-
- Posts: 850
- Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 12:01 pm
Re: Reduction of noise from baseboards
LesGros wrote::idea: Has anyone tried using egg trays( papier Mache) under the base boards?
If so, was it effective?
Is that before or after installing all the wiring?
Rod
-
- Posts: 546
- Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 10:05 pm
Re: Reduction of noise from baseboards
Rod,
Just an enquiry, but probably after, and in a way which would allow removal/hinging to one side for access.
cheery,
Just an enquiry, but probably after, and in a way which would allow removal/hinging to one side for access.
cheery,
LesG
The man who never made a mistake
never made anything useful
The man who never made a mistake
never made anything useful
-
- Posts: 2527
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 3:54 pm
Re: Reduction of noise from baseboards
Obviously useful to have an architect with real knowledges on this one. Bet it feels satisfying to be the expert occasionally Tim.
Fair point, so clearly if you mech grinds (Sharman spur ears were really good at this) or whines (like all but the first generation of Portescaps) springing will not help. However highlevel gearboxes (and the motors usually attached to them) are pretty quiet so that's need not be a significant part of the problem.
Who wrote:...If the sound is coming from a mechanism such as the loco wheels and is transferring noise and vibration from above into the structure of the baseboard, then springing will prevent to some extent the transfer of this noise, but as the motor is floating on the axle (in most instances) and so not part of the sprung weight, it will not isolate the motor noise from the structure...
Fair point, so clearly if you mech grinds (Sharman spur ears were really good at this) or whines (like all but the first generation of Portescaps) springing will not help. However highlevel gearboxes (and the motors usually attached to them) are pretty quiet so that's need not be a significant part of the problem.
-
- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2015 3:39 pm
Re: Reduction of noise from baseboards
Will L wrote:Obviously useful to have an architect with real knowledges on this one. Bet it feels satisfying to be the expert occasionally Tim.
With the Caveat the I am not and acoustic engineer, though I know couple with whom I work on a regular basis .... I am reasonable on the theory - but the engineers do the calcs and advise on the specifics .... though again my best guesses are getting quite good.
Tim Lee
-
- Posts: 643
- Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:31 pm
Re: Reduction of noise from baseboards
Just adding my penny's worth to this. Having only recently been able to run trains all the way around my layout I was quite surprised how noisy it was, except where I have used Flexi-Track then it's totally silent. When I'm running trains around the layout I have to look up when the train hits the Flexi-Track to check that nothing has derailed. The Flexi-Track runs on rubberised cork which covers the entire baseboard, where the scenic track just runs on a rubberised cork track bed. I'm hoping that as scenic items are added the noise will rebate.
Dave
Dave
Return to “Baseboards and Carpentry”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot and 0 guests