Which axle to motorise on 4-6-0?
-
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 2:34 pm
Which axle to motorise on 4-6-0?
Are there any specific reasons why a particular axle is better for motorisation of a 4-6-0 tender engine, or a 4-6-4 tank which are likely to be built with fixed axkles, no suspension?
Connah's Quay Workshop threads: viewforum.php?f=125
-
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 5:15 pm
Re: Which axle to motorise on 4-6-0?
jon price wrote:Are there any specific reasons why a particular axle is better for motorisation of a 4-6-0 tender engine, or a 4-6-4 tank which are likely to be built with fixed axkles, no suspension?
The one that was driven on the real loco? Better modelling, and less strain on the rods than driven from one end.
Ted.
(A purists' purist)
-
- Posts: 1114
- Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 7:39 pm
Re: Which axle to motorise on 4-6-0?
Not all 4-6-0s were driven on the centre axle, but as Ted implies, driving the centre couple axle is best as it also reduces the effect of clearances in the crankpins and bearings.
-
- Posts: 809
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 6:39 pm
Re: Which axle to motorise on 4-6-0?
And of course there were prototypes that were driven on the leading and centre wheels, leaving the rear wheel to keep up as a coupled wheel to the centre driver.
Anybody for two synchronised motors in one of these?
John
Anybody for two synchronised motors in one of these?
John
Slaving away still on GCR stuff ...
-
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 2:34 pm
Re: Which axle to motorise on 4-6-0?
Thanks for this advice. I will go for the center axle.
Connah's Quay Workshop threads: viewforum.php?f=125
-
- Posts: 2190
- Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 5:56 pm
Re: Which axle to motorise on 4-6-0?
A few things not mentioned is will the gearbox be visible on the center axle and the center axle is usually the one set up with the most side to side movement (ot the most flexibility generally).
The RTR guys tend to use way more flimsy coupling rods than we do and they tend to go for the rear axles. There must be hundreds of thousands of 4-6-0 out there and it's not a problem you ever really hear about.
The RTR guys tend to use way more flimsy coupling rods than we do and they tend to go for the rear axles. There must be hundreds of thousands of 4-6-0 out there and it's not a problem you ever really hear about.
-
- Posts: 1180
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2019 3:48 pm
Re: Which axle to motorise on 4-6-0?
Driving the same axle as the prototype might be the ideal - the coupling rod will have a longer bearing in this crankpin - but that doesn't necessarily exclude the rear as long as you don't use those separate bits of coupling rod that overlap on a crankpin. The leading axle will usually be a no no as we often end up with a thin boss and short bearing.
If there's some clearance in the rods, it doesn't look good if the wrong axle turns first when starting.
DaveB
If there's some clearance in the rods, it doesn't look good if the wrong axle turns first when starting.
DaveB
-
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2019 10:54 pm
Re: Which axle to motorise on 4-6-0?
And just to be a smart a55, the UP Challengers were driven on the last axle...
John
John
-
- Posts: 2527
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 3:54 pm
Re: Which axle to motorise on 4-6-0?
In our fine scale lives, where jointed rods are the order of the day, there is always the possibility of a little lost motion on each joint. Thus It is marginally more difficult to ensure you get a bind free chassis if you drive the first or last axle on any 3 driven axle chassis. However no worse than is inevitable if you want to build anything with more than 3*. A little extra care needed perhaps but nothing we shouldn't be able to overcome, so in my life I tend to put the drive were I can best hid it, which tends to be under the cab on the 3rd axle. This also means you not trying to put side play on the driven axle.
* That said I think the centre (flange less) axle of a 9F maybe the only sensible choice. 4 coupled locos are best driven on the third axle as this leaves you able to put side pay on the 2nd and 4th axle which works well
* That said I think the centre (flange less) axle of a 9F maybe the only sensible choice. 4 coupled locos are best driven on the third axle as this leaves you able to put side pay on the 2nd and 4th axle which works well
-
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 5:15 pm
Re: Which axle to motorise on 4-6-0?
Proton wrote:And just to be a smart a55, the UP Challengers were driven on the last axle...
John
As were the USA 0-6-0 tanks on the Southern. So that's where I would drive mine if I ever got round to building one.
But oh! - the prototype equalisation...
Ted.
(A purists' purist)
-
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2013 2:49 pm
Re: Which axle to motorise on 4-6-0?
Will L wrote: 4 coupled locos are best driven on the third axle as this leaves you able to put side pay on the 2nd and 4th axle which works well
Er, a 4 coupled is an 0-4-0. I presume you mean an 8 coupled 0-8-0?
-
- Posts: 2527
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 3:54 pm
Re: Which axle to motorise on 4-6-0?
Enigma wrote:Will L wrote: 4 coupled locos are best driven on the third axle as this leaves you able to put side pay on the 2nd and 4th axle which works well
Er, a 4 coupled is an 0-4-0. I presume you mean an 8 coupled 0-8-0?
Depends if your counting wheels or axles. Doing CSB calculations has meant I tend to think in terms of axles But yes I could have expressed it better
Return to “Chassis and Suspensions”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Applebot, ClaudeBot and 1 guest