One of the loco's waiting construction on my workbench is a Comet Compound chassis with a Hornby body. I have been trying to work out a way of making the chassis sprung or compensated but due to the small wheelbase it is baffling me a little as to what options i have to make it work correctly. Has anyone made a compound chassis & which way did you go about compensating the chassis, also what position did you fit the motor? I was thinking that maybe doing a motor in tender with driveshaft to the engine might work but still unsure what is the best way of making it work well?
Simon.
compound chassis suspension.
-
- Forum Team
- Posts: 3923
- Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 8:02 pm
Re: compound chassis suspension.
Not sure what you mean by small wheelbase? Its on the big side for 4-4-0s. Bill Bedford does the 2P and the same principles will work, suggest downloading his instructions to use for inspiration.
Regards
Regards
-
- Posts: 1957
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 7:49 pm
Re: compound chassis suspension.
I have two suggestions for compensation, depending on how much work you want to do!
1. Fixed rear axle for motor and gearbox, front driving axle compensated on simple beam Front bogie compensated on rear axle, just with a slot in the sideframes and again a simple wire beam. Bogie pivot pin lightly sprung, bogie support slotted to allow sideplay. Tender built to bear weight on loco rear.
2. Both driving axles compensated with twin beams and a central pivot. Bogie compensated as above supported firmly on the centre pin, slotted again. Tender again to bear weight on loco rear.
Of the two, I think I prefer option 2 but either work very well. In both cases, I find that the slight resistance offered by the bogie resting on the spacer or by the spring gives a degree of side control.
I'm never sprung an engine (yet) and there are others on this forum far more qualified than I to advise you there. Or on this, come to that...
Philip
1. Fixed rear axle for motor and gearbox, front driving axle compensated on simple beam Front bogie compensated on rear axle, just with a slot in the sideframes and again a simple wire beam. Bogie pivot pin lightly sprung, bogie support slotted to allow sideplay. Tender built to bear weight on loco rear.
2. Both driving axles compensated with twin beams and a central pivot. Bogie compensated as above supported firmly on the centre pin, slotted again. Tender again to bear weight on loco rear.
Of the two, I think I prefer option 2 but either work very well. In both cases, I find that the slight resistance offered by the bogie resting on the spacer or by the spring gives a degree of side control.
I'm never sprung an engine (yet) and there are others on this forum far more qualified than I to advise you there. Or on this, come to that...
Philip
-
- Posts: 618
- Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 4:51 pm
Re: compound chassis suspension.
Why not try the GA sprung units, half way down this thread;
viewtopic.php?f=19&t=1038
Got to be easier than adjusting for loads off the back of the tender...just a thought.
Mike
viewtopic.php?f=19&t=1038
Got to be easier than adjusting for loads off the back of the tender...just a thought.
Mike
Return to “Chassis and Suspensions”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot and 1 guest