Simple question really, on curved estuarine bridges where an opening section was required, would the track on the swing section always have to be straight?
Steve
Swing Bridges
-
- Posts: 912
- Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 10:16 pm
Swing Bridges
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Posts: 1956
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 7:49 pm
Re: Swing Bridges
I don't know the answer to your question, Steve, but by way of being even more unhelpful I always thought that Barnstaple was just a viaduct. As there was (is) a masonry road bridge alongside there wouldn't have been much point in an opening.
Philip
Philip
-
- Posts: 912
- Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 10:16 pm
Re: Swing Bridges
You are quite right Phil, Barnstaple rail bridge was just a fixed bridge. I'm looking at something similar for Watermouth where the line describes a 180* curve over an estuary. It just occurred to me that a swing section might be needed (non - working!) to allow craft to move upriver. However I'm not out to make life unnecessarily difficult for myself!
Steve
Steve
-
- Posts: 1983
- Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:04 pm
Re: Swing Bridges
steve howe wrote:Simple question really, on curved estuarine bridges where an opening section was required, would the track on the swing section always have to be straight?
I don't know, but I can't think of one off-hand that isn't. I suspect the issue is a need for symmetrical loadings on the central pivot and the impossibility of achieving this with a curved girder.
Regards
Noel
Noel
-
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 11:04 pm
Re: Swing Bridges
The load of the bridge alone could still be properly balanced about a pivot with curved rails.
The dynamic load of a train crossing is never truly balanced, but would be worse on a curve. And bridge structural members are always straight, for strength and stiffness reasons. That may explain why they are typically straight rails.
Stephan
The dynamic load of a train crossing is never truly balanced, but would be worse on a curve. And bridge structural members are always straight, for strength and stiffness reasons. That may explain why they are typically straight rails.
Stephan
-
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 8:23 am
Re: Swing Bridges
The viaduct over the Tay at Perth might be useful, and in some ways is not unlike Barnstaple.
In this photo the swing bridge can be seen at the far end. It was manually operated.
Jim
In this photo the swing bridge can be seen at the far end. It was manually operated.
Jim
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 9:13 am
Re: Swing Bridges
Not that it helps but Barmouth was straight too.
-
- Posts: 2527
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 3:54 pm
Re: Swing Bridges
Interesting question. While having doodled around the subject a bit, I think it must be possible to design such a think. You'd have to add extra strength to allow for the differential loading, and the span would need to be longer for the same clear passageway through, as the curved deck would inevitable intrude into it a bit. On the whole I'm inclined to think the additional difficulties involved would mean that sticking in a short strait section would tend to be simpler and cheaper.
Return to “Other Buildings and Scenery”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot and 0 guests