Electro magnets for AJs

User avatar
RobM
Posts: 833
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 4:39 pm

Re: Electro magnets for AJs

Postby RobM » Fri Jan 26, 2018 8:00 am

martinm wrote:So what do people do with unfilled track?
Surely it should not be above rail level?
The droplets certainly must always be above rail level!
martin


Although I use Dingham's I think the same principle applies. On Manston Brewery I have a section of infilled track with an electromagnetic just below rail level and it works fine. You can just see it between the wagon and the loco on page 1, 2nd photo down. https://www.scalefour.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=101&t=2819 The electromagnets are those supplied by Dingham's.
Rob
http://www.robmilliken.co.uk
Updated December 2016

User avatar
steamraiser
Posts: 313
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 4:49 pm

Re: Electro magnets for AJs

Postby steamraiser » Fri Jan 26, 2018 9:23 am

For AJ's I was mulling the problem over with Gordon Gravett.
The problem with infilled track is that there is no space for the coupling dropper to be pulled down into when uncoupling.
I was thinking of having a couple of manholes with the covers off to create the space.
GG's answer is to bring the magnets up to the top of rail level and shorten the dropper on the AJ.

Gordon A

User avatar
Paul Townsend
Posts: 635
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 6:09 pm

Re: Electro magnets for AJs

Postby Paul Townsend » Fri Jan 26, 2018 10:07 am

steamraiser wrote:The problem with infilled track is that there is no space for the coupling dropper to be pulled down into when uncoupling.

I was thinking of having a couple of manholes with the covers off to create the space.
Gordon A


Wouldn't they would have to be mighty big manholes if you wanted to shunt across the uncoupler magnet to get the 2 hits.

steamraiser wrote:GG's answer is to bring the magnets up to the top of rail level and shorten the dropper on the AJ.
Gordon A


So you have to have a few special wagons for this.
OK for GG's latest model with minimal stock but when you have 50+ wagons running this feels a bit limiting for playing trains type operation. Viable for a disciplined timetable I guess.

I seek a definitive solution to this as I need to apply it in the next few months!

User avatar
steve howe
Posts: 390
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 10:16 pm

Re: Electro magnets for AJs

Postby steve howe » Fri Jan 26, 2018 1:19 pm

I thought the specification for the AJ was such that the dropper did not descend below rail level? I don't have any infilled track on my current project but I do have a road crossing immediately adjacent to a magnet, in tests only one wagon fouled the crossing when under magnetic influence and on inspection I found the dropper length was 10mm instead of the specified 9mm. All other vehicles pass over OK.

Steve

User avatar
steamraiser
Posts: 313
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 4:49 pm

Re: Electro magnets for AJs

Postby steamraiser » Fri Jan 26, 2018 4:52 pm

Steve,
I find with the couplings at rest the droppers clear the rails, but when passing over a magnet the droppers go below rail level.

For Pauls objections you could have a short dropper on one end of the wagon with a standard dropper on the other end.
If you come up with a workable alternative I would be interested, unless you go for three links.

Gordon A

User avatar
steve howe
Posts: 390
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 10:16 pm

Re: Electro magnets for AJs

Postby steve howe » Fri Feb 02, 2018 5:29 pm

Lots of good practical stuff here:

http://www.lbscrmodels.co.uk/aj1.html

Steve

Terry Bendall
Posts: 1460
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 7:46 am

Re: Electro magnets for AJs

Postby Terry Bendall » Sat Feb 03, 2018 9:42 am

steve howe wrote:Lots of good practical stuff here:http://www.lbscrmodels.co.uk/aj1.html


Yes there is but if you read to the end you will find that Barry Luck has given up on using AJs and he explains why.

The book published by the Society on using AJs has on page 17 some useful drawings with dimensions. This section is a reprint from MRJ No 55 so if you don't have the book you might have the relevant copy. According to the drawing, for a wagon with 12mm dia. wheels, the horizontal wire should be 10mm above the rail. The end of the dropper, when at rest should be 1.5mm above the top of the rail and will move down by 3mm when the current is applied to the magnet. That would seem to cause problems with inset track.

I don't use AJs and probably never will but perhaps there is a need for some changes to cope with inset track. Perhaps an experts in the use of Ajs has the answer.

Terry Bendall

User avatar
steve howe
Posts: 390
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 10:16 pm

Re: Electro magnets for AJs

Postby steve howe » Sat Feb 03, 2018 2:12 pm

I do sympathise with Barry's point - I think there is an element of 'Holy Grail' with the AJ, and its devotees may be a little too emotionally attached to achieving the un-achievable - that is a perfect, reliable and realistic auto-coupling system, to overlook its shortcomings. As we've discussed here before, there are many approaches and each have their drawbacks; the AJ scores in its discretion, but misses on many other counts, particularly those discussed in Barry's epilogue.

For myself I'm up to 20 odd vehicles and three locos now fitted with AJs and am embarking on the long and tedious process of testing each one 'live' on the layout, which is very different to achieving 100% reliability on the test track. Mine is a simple shunting plank with small locos and mainly short freight stock, I'm not sure I can be sold on the AJ in the longer term if ever a more ambitious project were to be undertaken. Its been a long and interesting (and at times downright frustrating) learning curve which is not over yet!

User avatar
Le Corbusier
Posts: 862
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2015 3:39 pm

Re: Electro magnets for AJs

Postby Le Corbusier » Sat Feb 03, 2018 2:23 pm

steve howe wrote:I do sympathise with Barry's point - I think there is an element of 'Holy Grail' with the AJ, and its devotees may be a little too emotionally attached to achieving the un-achievable - that is a perfect, reliable and realistic auto-coupling system, to overlook its shortcomings. As we've discussed here before, there are many approaches and each have their drawbacks; the AJ scores in its discretion, but misses on many other counts, particularly those discussed in Barry's epilogue.

For myself I'm up to 20 odd vehicles and three locos now fitted with AJs and am embarking on the long and tedious process of testing each one 'live' on the layout, which is very different to achieving 100% reliability on the test track. Mine is a simple shunting plank with small locos and mainly short freight stock, I'm not sure I can be sold on the AJ in the longer term if ever a more ambitious project were to be undertaken. Its been a long and interesting (and at times downright frustrating) learning curve which is not over yet!


Didn't Iain Rice develop his own simpler version of the AJ coupling. How does that measure up? or is it regarded more as a curiosity?
Tim Lee

User avatar
Flymo748
Posts: 2086
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 6:00 pm

Re: Electro magnets for AJs

Postby Flymo748 » Wed Feb 07, 2018 7:46 am

Le Corbusier wrote:
steve howe wrote:I do sympathise with Barry's point - I think there is an element of 'Holy Grail' with the AJ, and its devotees may be a little too emotionally attached to achieving the un-achievable - that is a perfect, reliable and realistic auto-coupling system, to overlook its shortcomings. As we've discussed here before, there are many approaches and each have their drawbacks; the AJ scores in its discretion, but misses on many other counts, particularly those discussed in Barry's epilogue.

For myself I'm up to 20 odd vehicles and three locos now fitted with AJs and am embarking on the long and tedious process of testing each one 'live' on the layout, which is very different to achieving 100% reliability on the test track. Mine is a simple shunting plank with small locos and mainly short freight stock, I'm not sure I can be sold on the AJ in the longer term if ever a more ambitious project were to be undertaken. Its been a long and interesting (and at times downright frustrating) learning curve which is not over yet!


Didn't Iain Rice develop his own simpler version of the AJ coupling. How does that measure up? or is it regarded more as a curiosity?


I feel it remained the latter. Very much hand made, and not something that I recall having been taken up elsewhere. I think he described it as something like "an inverted tension-lock, in wire".

Of course, the incompatibility won't matter if you only run your own stock on your own layout, or don't have any visitors contributing stock either. Or you have converter wagons ;-)

Cheers
Flymo
Beware of Trains - occasional modelling in progress!
www.5522models.co.uk


Return to “Couplings”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest